The Experimental Philosophy Blog

Philosophy Meets Empirical Research

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guidelines for Comments
  • Labs and Organizations
  • Resources
Menu

Talk: “How Language Supports the Acquisition of Predicates of Mental States and Emotions” (Kristen Syrett and Misha Becker)

Posted on January 15, 2025January 15, 2025 by Alexander Max Bauer

On Monday, January 20, from 14:30–16:00 (UTC+1), the “Slurring Terms Across Languages” (STAL) network will present Kristen Syrett and Misha Becker’s talk “How Language Supports the Acquisition of Predicates of Mental States and Emotions” as part of the STAL seminar series. The abstract reads:

As children acquire adjectives, they must tackle the challenge that while some properties denoted by these predicates are stable and visually salient (e.g., color, shape), others (e.g., emotions and mental states like happy, sad, or confident) lack a reliable physical correlate, and are typically only inferable via second order characteristics. How, then, do children master the meanings of adjectives that label these fleeting, internal, abstract states? One answer may lie in the very linguistic environment in which these adjectives appear. Previous work in language acquisition has documented the power of the frame and complementation patterns for verb learning, subject form for control and raising verbs, count syntax for acquiring nouns, and adverbial modification for different types of gradable adjectives. In this talk, I draw on this prior work to lay a foundation for a series of experiments investigating how children might recruit both syntactic and semantic cues in the input to narrow the hypothesis space for emotion/mental state adjective meaning. I begin by presenting extensive evidence from CHILDES corpora showing that while these adjectives are relatively infrequent in the input, they diverge from other adjectives (e.g., those of color, shape, size, or multidimensional subjective adjectives) in their preference of syntactic position, their requirements on subject animacy, and their syntactic complementation patterns. Next, I present data from a set of word guessing studies using scripted dialogues that both adults and older children (age 5–8) recruit the type of subject and syntactic complement to constrain adjective meaning. Finally, I present a set of binary forced-choice word learning studies putting emotion/mental state against color and shape showing once again, that the presence of an animate subject and syntactic complement points to an emotion/mental state adjective meaning, this time for preschoolers. Taken together, these experiments – the first to document the combined power of syntax and semantics for acquiring abstract adjective meaning – make connections between emotion/mental state adjectives and mental state verbs in word learning, thereby further demonstrating the potential universality of syntactic bootstrapping, and the role of language itself in focusing young word learners’ attention on mental aspects of the situation that are not readily observable.

The talk can be joined using Zoom. Please write an email to stalnetwork@gmail.com for the invitation link.

Tags: EmotionsLanguage AcquisitionMental States
Category: AnnouncementsPhilosophy of EmotionPhilosophy of Language

Post navigation

← Call: “EPSA25”
Talk: “Expressivity in Georgian and other Caucasian Languages” (Thomas Wier) →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Search

Categories

Tags

Agency Artificial Intelligence Basic Needs Beauty Behavior Beliefs Bias Bioethics Blame Causation Cognitive Science Coherence Consciousness Corpus Analysis Cross-Cultural Research Desires Distributive Justice Emotions Essentialism Expertise Expressives Folk Morality Free Will Implicatures Intention Intuition Jurisprudence Knowledge Large Language Models Logical Positivism Luck Norms Objectivism Pejoratives Problem of Evil Psycholinguistics Rationality Reasoning Reflective Equilibrium Responsibility Self Side-Effect Effect Slurs Valence Virtue

Recent Posts

  • Hot Off The Press: “The Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence”
  • Do people think that free will is incompatible with determinism?
  • Talk: “Creativity in Taboo Terms in Sign Languages” (Donna Jo Napoli)
  • Call: “Cognitive Tools in Action”
  • The Folk Concept of Art

Recent Comments

  1. Joshua Knobe on Do people think that free will is incompatible with determinism?May 7, 2025

    Sam, Great talking with you about all this. I am super open to either option, but just in case it's…

  2. Sam Murray on Do people think that free will is incompatible with determinism?May 7, 2025

    Josh, This helps to clear things up, thanks! It's an interesting question how to adjudicate between (1) and (2). Surely…

  3. Joshua Knobe on Do people think that free will is incompatible with determinism?May 6, 2025

    Hi Sam, This is fantastically helpful, thanks! You are completely right that I was proposing (1), but I appreciate your…

  4. Sam Murray on Do people think that free will is incompatible with determinism?May 6, 2025

    Hey Josh, I'll have to look at the new paper! I agree that people could have conflicting intuitions (and that…

  5. Joshua Knobe on Do people think that free will is incompatible with determinism?May 5, 2025

    Hi Sam, Great to hear from you! I absolutely love your work on this topic, and I'm so happy that…

Archives

  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Imprint • Disclaimer • Privacy Statement • Cookie Policy

© 2024 The Experimental Philosophy Blog
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View Preferences
{title} {title} {title}