The Experimental Philosophy Blog

Philosophy Meets Empirical Research

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guidelines for Comments
  • Labs and Organizations
  • Resources
Menu

Call: “International Congress of Empirical Biomedical Ethics”

Posted on August 17, 2026August 17, 2026 by Alexander Max Bauer

From January 28 to 29, 2027, the first International Congress of Empirical Biomedical Ethics will take place in Lausanne, Switzerland, under the theme “Explain, Justify, Defend.” The congress asks how empirical data can inform normative justification – how to bridge the gap between what people do, think, believe, or value and what ought to be.

Abstracts can be submitted until September 30, 2026. The call reads:

International Congress of Empirical Biomedical Ethics

28–29 January 2027, Lausanne, Switzerland

Explain, Justify, Defend

Empirical biomedical ethics is a research field that is both old and new. It builds on a long tradition of field exploration to ensure research questions remain relevant to concerned stakeholders, while also representing an emerging scholarly community working to structure its approaches and methodologies. Biomedical ethics is inherently plural, shaped by interdisciplinarity, diverse cultural backgrounds, national and local contexts, as well as various moral frameworks. Where philosophers and theologians first laid down conceptual and theoretical groundwork to address ethical concerns in medicine, the empirical turn in biomedical ethics saw the social and health sciences bring in their own perspectives and methods to ground ethical judgments in the realities of clinical experience, patient and family perspectives, and complex social contexts. Medical professionals themselves have started to train in and engage with the field. While it is sometimes thought to occupy too much space and resources within the medical humanities more generally, biomedical ethics is still seeking to find its unique place among the philosophy, history, geography or sociology of medicine or science. Its defining trait – its normativity – is both the source of its internal disarray and what unifies it, what sets it apart and what intertwines it deeply into other fields.

As an emerging academic field and community, empirical biomedical ethics attempts to find coherence and to structure itself around one central question: how to bridge the gap between the descriptive and the normative, between what is – what people do, think, believe or value – and what ought to be.

The first International Congress on Empirical Biomedical Ethics (ICEBE) aims to bring together researchers, medical professionals and other concerned stakeholders from diverse backgrounds. Our goal is to foster dialogue, share methodologies and build a cohesive community around the central challenge of bridging the descriptive and the normative. In order to do so, it proposes to focus on a theme that can be explored both from a methodological or from a content perspective: Explain, Justify, Defend. As an academic field, how does empirical biomedical ethics attempt to explain the relationship between facts and values? How does empirical data inform normative justifications? Can concerned stakeholders’ actual beliefs and ideals be used to defend normative judgements and, if so, to what extent? But also, for example, how do clinicians explain their decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units, and how do these explanations align with or diverge from the ethical principles and legal frameworks governing end-of-life care? How do healthcare professionals defend or justify the unequal distribution of emotional labour carried out by doctors, nurses or care assistants, and how does it relate to wider gender dynamics?

We invite you to join us on January 28th and 29th in Lausanne, Switzerland to explore these questions, share your work, and shape the future of empirical biomedical ethics. Together, we can advance our understanding of how to explain, justify, and defend ethical judgments in medicine.

Scientific Committee

  • Brenda Bogaert (Institute for Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne)
  • Pr. Richard Huxtable (University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School (PHS), Centre for Ethics in Medicine)
  • Pr. Jonathan Ives (University of Bristol, Bristol Medical School (PHS), Centre for Ethics in Medicine)
  • Agnes Kandlbinder (Institute for Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne; University Research Priority Program: “Human Reproduction Reloaded,” University of Zurich)
  • Cristina Murano (Department of Philosophy and Society, Faculty of Philosophy, University Complutense of Madrid)
  • Sophie Püchel (Institute for Humanities in Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne)
  • Morgane Romero (Université de Lausanne, Centre Interdisciplinaire de Recherches en Éthique (CIRE))
  • Silke Schicktanz (Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine at the University Medical Center Göttingen)
  • Julia Tinland (Aix-Marseille Université, SESSTIM, CaLIPSo)

Call for Abstracts

  • Word length: <300 words
  • Format: Word, author(s)’s name(s), discipline(s) and affiliations on a separate 1st page
  • Deadline: September 30th, 2026
  • Submit to: https://icebe.sciencesconf.org/submission/submit
  • Results: October 20th, 2026
  • Registration fees: 65 CHF
Tags: BioethicsValues
Category: CallsEthics and Morals

Post navigation

← Job: “Hearing and Remembering” (Turin, Italy)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Search

Categories

Tags

Agency Artificial Intelligence Basic Needs Behavior Beliefs Bias Bioethics Blame Causation Cognitive Science Consciousness Corpus Analysis Cross-Cultural Research Decisions Determinism Distributive Justice Emotions Essentialism Expertise Folk Morality Framing Free Will Intention Intuition Jurisprudence Knowledge Large Language Models Moral Psychology Norms Pejoratives Pragmatics Psycholinguistics Psychology Reasoning Reflective Equilibrium Replication Responsibility Self Semantics Side-Effect Effect Slurs Thought Experiments Valence Values Virtue

Recent Posts

  • Call: “International Congress of Empirical Biomedical Ethics”
  • Job: “Hearing and Remembering” (Turin, Italy)
  • Job: Lectureship or Senior Lectureship in Philosophy (Loughborough, UK)
  • Call: “18th International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science and Technology”
  • Survey: “Intuitions and Philosophical Expertise”

Recent Comments

  1. Joanna Demaree-Cotton on Where Should I Publish My X-Phi? A New ResourceApril 24, 2026

    Thanks for the comment, that's really useful. We'll definitely add AJP (missed you accidentally first time!), and that note.

  2. AJP Editor on Where Should I Publish My X-Phi? A New ResourceApril 24, 2026

    AJP is published by Taylor & Francis, and we have an member of the editorial team ('associate editor' in our…

  3. Nova Praxis on The Folk Concept of ArtJuly 11, 2025

    This article highlights an important point: everyday people don’t rely on rigid definitions to determine what qualifies as art. They’re…

  4. Koen Smets on Priming Effects Are Fake, but Framing Effects Are RealMay 27, 2025

    That is indeed exactly the question I have as well. I operationalize it as having de facto contradicting intuitions, in…

  5. Joshua Knobe on Priming Effects Are Fake, but Framing Effects Are RealMay 24, 2025

    Hi Koen, Thanks once again. This idea brings up all sorts of fascinating questions, but for the purposes of the…

Archives

  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Imprint • Disclaimer • Privacy Statement • Cookie Policy

© 2024 The Experimental Philosophy Blog
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}