The Experimental Philosophy Blog

Philosophy Meets Empirical Research

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guidelines for Comments
  • Labs and Organizations
  • Resources
  • Newsletter
Menu

Survey: “Dualist And Physicalist Minds”

Posted on October 23, 2026October 23, 2026 by Alexander Max Bauer

Christoffer Lundbak Olesen (Aarhus University), Mads Hansen (University of Bristol), and Karsten Olsen (Aarhus University) invite academics who work in or are familiar with consciousness research to take part in a preregistered study on whether differences in subjective experience shape philosophical intuitions about consciousness.

The invitation reads:

We are conducting a research study investigating academics who work in or are familiar with consciousness research. The study explores whether differences in subjective experience influence philosophical intuitions about consciousness, particularly the divide between physicalist and dualist perspectives. The study is part of an accepted Preregistered Report.

We kindly invite you to participate in this study by completing an anonymous questionnaire (approx. 30 minutes). Your participation would help to illuminate how theoretical and experiential factors relate, and whether disagreement within the field may be influenced by pre-theoretic experiential biases.

Read more about the study and access the survey here: https://survey.au.dk/LinkCollector?key=81KSG25CS136

Or visit the Aarhus University survey website https://survey.au.dk/collect and type in the code: 81KS-G25C-S136

The link will take you to the website containing the survey. Here you will first be asked to provide your voluntary consent before proceeding to the study survey, which includes questions about your metaphysical views on consciousness, scenario-based thought experiments, and a set of validated psychological instruments that help us understand your experiential profile. Participation is entirely voluntary and anonymous. All data will be handled securely and in full compliance with GDPR.

We would also be very grateful if you could forward this invitation to colleagues who work on or are interested in consciousness.

The study is conducted as a collaboration between experimental researchers and philosophers at Aarhus University and the University of Bristol. If you would like to be informed when the results of the study come out, please reply with your preferred email, and you will receive a message from us.

Tags: ConsciousnessExpertiseIntuition
Category: AnnouncementsMetaphilosophyPhilosophy of Mind

Post navigation

← Workshop: “Experimental Philosophy Online Work-in-Progress Workshop”

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Are you human? Please solve:Captcha


Search

Categories

Tags

Agency Artificial Intelligence Basic Needs Behavior Beliefs Bias Bioethics Blame Causation Cognitive Science Consciousness Corpus Analysis Cross-Cultural Research Decisions Determinism Distributive Justice Emotions Essentialism Expertise Folk Morality Framing Free Will Intention Intuition Jurisprudence Knowledge Large Language Models Memory Moral Psychology Norms Pejoratives Pragmatics Psycholinguistics Psychology Reasoning Reflective Equilibrium Replication Responsibility Semantics Side-Effect Effect Slurs Thought Experiments Valence Values Virtue

Recent Posts

  • Survey: “Dualist And Physicalist Minds”
  • Workshop: “Experimental Philosophy Online Work-in-Progress Workshop”
  • A New R Package and Interactive App for Computational Models of Causal Judgment
  • Survey: Philosophers’ Views on Exploitation
  • Call: “Complutense Workshop on Intuitions and Experimental Philosophy”

Recent Comments

  1. Paul Henne on A New R Package and Interactive App for Computational Models of Causal JudgmentOctober 13, 2026

    Thank you for this contribution, Tadeg! I'm looking forward to seeing how future researchers will use this

  2. Joanna Demaree-Cotton on Where Should I Publish My X-Phi? A New ResourceApril 24, 2026

    Thanks for the comment, that's really useful. We'll definitely add AJP (missed you accidentally first time!), and that note.

  3. AJP Editor on Where Should I Publish My X-Phi? A New ResourceApril 24, 2026

    AJP is published by Taylor & Francis, and we have an member of the editorial team ('associate editor' in our…

  4. Nova Praxis on The Folk Concept of ArtJuly 11, 2025

    This article highlights an important point: everyday people don’t rely on rigid definitions to determine what qualifies as art. They’re…

  5. Koen Smets on Priming Effects Are Fake, but Framing Effects Are RealMay 27, 2025

    That is indeed exactly the question I have as well. I operationalize it as having de facto contradicting intuitions, in…

Archives

  • October 2026
  • September 2026
  • August 2026
  • July 2026
  • June 2026
  • May 2026
  • April 2026
  • March 2026
  • February 2026
  • January 2026
  • December 2025
  • November 2025
  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Imprint • Disclaimer • Privacy Statement • Cookie Policy

© 2024 The Experimental Philosophy Blog
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}