The Experimental Philosophy Blog

Philosophy Meets Empirical Research

Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Guidelines for Comments
  • Labs and Organizations
  • Resources
Menu

Hot Off The Press: “Priority of Needs?”

Posted on July 9, 2024January 3, 2025 by Alexander Max Bauer

Members of the interdisciplinary research group “Need-Based Justice and Distribution Procedures,” funded by the German Research Foundation, have summarized the results of more than six years of research in the volume “Priority of Needs? An Informed Theory of Need-Based Justice,” edited by Bernhard Kittel and Stefan Traub. The research group’s mission statement reads:

The objective of the research group “Need-Based Justice and Distribution Procedures” is to empirically contribute to establishing a positive and informed normative theory of need-based justice. This theory should provide answers to four questions: (i) How do individuals identify their needs and which distributions are considered sufficient for those needs? (ii) On the collective level, what is considered need-based justice and which processes lead to acceptance of those needs? (iii) Which collective dynamics unfold during this acceptance process in the context of (un-)stable political compromises? (iv) Which incentive-based effects of the collective level can be observed on the individual level, and is a need-based redistribution sustainable?

See below for the table of contents.

Part 1 – Identification of Needs

  • Adele Diederich: “Need as One Distribution Principle – Frames and Framing”
  • Alexander Max Bauer and Mark Siebel: “Measuring Need-Based Justice – Empirically and Formally”

Part 2 – Structures and Processes of the Recognition of Needs

  • Bernhard Kittel: “The Social Recognition of Needs”
  • Markus Tepe and Nils Springhorn: “The Political Recognition of Needs”
  • Tanja Pritzlaff-Scheele, Patricia F. Zauchner, and Frank Nullmeier: “Deliberation and Need-Based Distribution”

Part 3 – Welfare Consequences of Prioritizing Need-Based Distributions

  • Andreas Nicklisch: “Need-Based Justice and Social Utility – A Preference Approach”
  • Stefan Traub, Jan Philipp Krügel, and Meike Benker: “How Sustainable is Need-Based Redistribution?”

Part 4 – Differentiation

  • Kai-Uwe Schnapp: “Need and Street-Level Bureaucracy – How Street-Level Bureaucrats Understand and Prioritize Need”
  • Adele Diederich and Marc Wyszynski: “Justice Principles, Prioritization in the Healthcare Sector, and the Effect of Framing”

Literature

Kittel, Bernhard, and Stefan Traub (eds.) (2024): Priority of Needs? An Informed Theory of Need-Based Justice, Cham: Springer. (Link)

Tags: Basic NeedsDeliberationDistributive JusticeFolk MoralityFramingResponsibility
Category: Ethics and MoralsHot Off The PressPolitical Philosophy

Post navigation

← Hot Off The Press: “Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy”
The Folk Concept of Luck →

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Search

Categories

Tags

Agency Artificial Intelligence Basic Needs Beauty Behavior Beliefs Bias Bioethics Blame Causation Cognitive Science Consciousness Corpus Analysis Cross-Cultural Research Determinism Distributive Justice Emotions Essentialism Expertise Expressives Folk Morality Framing Free Will Gender Intention Intuition Jurisprudence Knowledge Large Language Models Luck Norms Objectivism Pejoratives Problem of Evil Psycholinguistics Reasoning Reflective Equilibrium Replication Responsibility Self Side-Effect Effect Slurs Truth Valence Virtue

Recent Posts

  • Hot Off The Press: “Empirical Studies on Questions of Need-Based Distributive Justice”
  • Call: “Valence Asymmetries”
  • Talk: “Intentionality and Discrimination”
  • Call: “Folk Epistemology”
  • Call: “Philosophers on Philosophy”

Recent Comments

  1. Nova Praxis on The Folk Concept of ArtJuly 11, 2025

    This article highlights an important point: everyday people don’t rely on rigid definitions to determine what qualifies as art. They’re…

  2. Koen Smets on Priming Effects Are Fake, but Framing Effects Are RealMay 27, 2025

    That is indeed exactly the question I have as well. I operationalize it as having de facto contradicting intuitions, in…

  3. Joshua Knobe on Priming Effects Are Fake, but Framing Effects Are RealMay 24, 2025

    Hi Koen, Thanks once again. This idea brings up all sorts of fascinating questions, but for the purposes of the…

  4. Koen Smets on Priming Effects Are Fake, but Framing Effects Are RealMay 24, 2025

    Great! In the meantime I thought of another potentially interesting example of framing—Arnold Kling’s Three Languages of Politics. Just about…

  5. Joshua Knobe on Priming Effects Are Fake, but Framing Effects Are RealMay 23, 2025

    Thanks Koen! This is all super helpful.

Archives

  • October 2025
  • September 2025
  • August 2025
  • July 2025
  • June 2025
  • May 2025
  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Imprint • Disclaimer • Privacy Statement • Cookie Policy

© 2024 The Experimental Philosophy Blog
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View Preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}